U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,594
Sneed v. Harris
as 5:2025ct03031
Plaintiff:
Kinte Sneed
Defendant:
Robert Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitt v. City of Rocky Mount et al
as 5:2025ct03030
Plaintiff:
Montrell Lavar Pitt
Defendant:
City of Rocky Mount, Vicky Hussey and Michael Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Estes et al
as 5:2025ct03011
Defendant:
Tussie Boone, Roy Rooks, County of Halifax, NC and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Johnson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. Disability Rights North Carolina
as 4:2025cv00009
Defendant:
Disability Rights North Carolina
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohammed v. Campbell et al
as 5:2025ct03005
Defendant:
Ryan Chapman, Wendy Herring, Candice Gary and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fryar v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03306
Defendant:
Jeff Jackson and Tommy Scarantino
Plaintiff:
Octavius Fitzgerald Fryar and Octavius Fryar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobbs v. Hutzenbiler et al
as 5:2024ct03294
Defendant:
Courtney M. Last, Emily G. Lankler, Jeannie Berg and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Cobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spence v. Parole Board
as 5:2024ct03291
Plaintiff:
Delroy Spence
Defendant:
Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. City of Goldsboro et al
as 5:2024ct03285
Defendant:
City of Goldsboro and Jason R Erkes
Plaintiff:
Whitney Cherry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Tolbert v. Craft
as 5:2024ct03280
Plaintiff:
Richard Tolbert
Defendant:
Dr. Patrick Craft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
