US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,326
STATON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
KELLY STATON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
THOMAS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
EVON THOMAS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
TURMELLE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TURMELLE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
STANBACK v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
OLIVIA STANBACK
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PERKINS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PERKINS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
JONES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
KAREN JONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HAMPTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE HAMPTON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MAYFIELD v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL MAYFIELD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BEST v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL GAYLE BEST
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SSAOGCOMMS and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
UHLENBERG v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
ARWEN UHLENBERG
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SSAOGCOMMS and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
