US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
LINDSAY v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO. INC.
as 1:2018cv00406
Plaintiff:
BOBBY W. LINDSAY
Defendant:
EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
YOUNG v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
AARON S. YOUNG
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MULL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
BLAINE MULL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and C&S RAIL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
PARR v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2017cv00667
Plaintiff:
ERICKA PARR
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BLAKENEY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2017cv00563
Plaintiff:
ANTWON J. BLAKENEY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MARTIN v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv01191
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , FLATIRON CONSTRUCTORS, INC. , DOGGETT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
ROSSER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2016cv00401
Plaintiff:
JUDITH ROSSER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
NORRIS v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2014cv00830
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH NORRIS
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ROGERS v. U.S. CORP.
as 1:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
HOWARD S. ROGERS
Defendant:
U.S. CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
