U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 316
YATES v. TOWN OF PINEVILLE et al
as 1:2025cv00327
Plaintiff:
BRENDA YATES
Defendant:
TOWN OF PINEVILLE and JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MCCALLUM v. NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES
as 1:2025cv00170
Plaintiff:
EDWARD FREDERICK MCCALLUM, III
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCALLUM v. KANNAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2025cv00171
Plaintiff:
EDWARD FREDERICK MCCALLUM, III
Defendant:
KANNAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT and MUELLER AUTOMOTIVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSSER v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2025cv00169
Plaintiff:
RACHEL MOSSER
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
TREADWAY v. DAN MILLER TRUCKING, LTD. et al
as 1:2025cv00125
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ALLEN TREADWAY
Defendant:
DAN MILLER TRUCKING, LTD., WILLIAM W. BYLER, III and USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
JOHNSON v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC.
as 1:2025cv00091
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
HATCH v. AT&T INC.
as 1:2024cv00890
Defendant:
AT&T INC.
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE HATCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KOLESNICHENKO v. RATP DEV USA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00888
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and RATP DEV USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
SVETLANA KOLESNICHENKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones
as 1:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Nicole Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
JONES v. SHOE SHOW, INC.
as 1:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
NICOLE JONES
Defendant:
SHOE SHOW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
