North Carolina Contract Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 259
STROMBERG et al v. STRACKA et al
as 1:2013cv00610
Plaintiff:
MARCIA D. STROMBERG and ERIK H. STROMBERG
Defendant:
JAMES STRACKA and RONDA STRACKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Hopf et al
as 4:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
James F. Hopf and Julie B. Hopf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
PNC BANK, N.A. v. WASTE BENEFICIAL REUSE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00555
Plaintiff:
PNC BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WASTE BENEFICIAL REUSE SOLUTIONS, LLC, LARRY A. RHODES and SCARLETT B. RHODES
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PNC BANK, N.A. v. GAIL M D BELVETT, DDS AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. et al
as 1:2013cv00536
Plaintiff:
PNC BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
GAIL M D BELVETT, DDS AND ASSOCIATES, P.A., GAIL M.D. BELVETT, D.D.S., P.L.L.C. and GAIL M D BELVETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Buy Gitomer, Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00378
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Buy Gitomer, Inc. , Gitomer Buy Gitomer, LLC , Gitomer Home, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Synovus Bank v. Syed
as 1:2013cv00173
Defendant:
Babar Z. Syed
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Synovus Bank v. Browner
as 2:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Marc J. Browner
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Synovus Bank v. Browner
as 1:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Marc J. Browner
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Capital Bank, N.A. v. Bright's Creek Lot 71, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Capital Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Bright's Creek Lot 71, LLC and Samuel Lancelotta
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Thompson
as 3:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Williams
Defendant:
Bruce Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
