North Carolina Contract Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 265
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Buy Gitomer, Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00378
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Buy Gitomer, Inc. , Gitomer Buy Gitomer, LLC , Gitomer Home, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Synovus Bank v. Syed
as 1:2013cv00173
Defendant:
Babar Z. Syed
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Synovus Bank v. Browner
as 2:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Marc J. Browner
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Synovus Bank v. Browner
as 1:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Marc J. Browner
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Capital Bank, N.A. v. Bright's Creek Lot 71, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Capital Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Bright's Creek Lot 71, LLC and Samuel Lancelotta
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Thompson
as 3:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Williams
Defendant:
Bruce Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RREF ST ACQUISITIONS, LLC v. DASCALAKIS et al
as 1:2013cv00404
Plaintiff:
RREF ST ACQUISITIONS, LLC
Defendant:
DEMETRIOS DASCALAKIS , VOULA DASCALAKIS, MINAS DASCALAKIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
RBRE Loan Portfolio LLC v. MLHL Realty Company, et al
as 7:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
RBRE Loan Portfolio LLC
Defendant:
MLHL Realty Company , MLHL Realty LLC and Lawrence K. Neuwirth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Gaskill
as 2:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Eliot Tod Gaskill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Synovus Bank v. Wells et al
as 1:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
David F. Wells and Gregory A. Raxter
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
