North Carolina Real Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 1,121
Morris et al v. CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Amanda Morris and Joshua Morris
Defendant:
CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC and Raleigh Realty, Inc.
CPI Amherst SFR et al v. Alexander
as 5:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
CPI Amherst SFR and Main Street Renewal
Defendant:
Tameka Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SAFFORD v. SAFFORD-OLIVER
as 1:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH SAFFORD
Defendant:
KANDI MARIE SAFFORD-OLIVER and PENNY MAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
WILSON v. DOWTIN
as 1:2022cv00572
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WILSON
Defendant:
ELOISE DOWTIN
Hubbard v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Marc Hubbard
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC, First Equities Financial LLC and Asheth Hemant Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
The Money Source, Inc. v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
The Money Source, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Torts to Land
Zurich American Insurance Company v. REWJR Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Defendant:
REWJR Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Degen v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Richard Degen
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAKER v. CORMACK et al
as 1:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
NEAMIA B. BAKER
Defendant:
KAREN TATE CORMACK and CLAUDE CEDRICK CORMACK
CLYBURN v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
OMAR-WALEEDI CLYBURN
Defendant:
AARON ANDERSON, BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
