US District Court for the District of North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,120
Cavanaugh v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00152
Petitioner: Paul Henry Cavanaugh
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bradford v. USA
as 3:2022cv00148
Petitioner: Livon Cortez Bradford
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. Hagen
as 1:2022cv00142
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Johnson
Defendant: Dr. John Hagen, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carlson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00130
Petitioner: Sarah Ann Carlson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00126
Petitioner: Mardale Deshaun Johnson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ricot v. Mulder Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff: Toussaint Reginald Ricot
Defendant: Mulder Hospitality Group, Inc., Corey J Quinton, Marty Mulder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Pringle
as 3:2022cv00117
Petitioner: Jerry Verl Holmes, Sr.
Respondent: Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stiles v. USA
as 3:2022cv00115
Petitioner: Robert Carlton Stiles
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. USA
as 3:2022cv00113
Petitioner: Lornell Centrell Mitchell
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Atkins v. Pringle
as 3:2022cv00110
Petitioner: Cody Michael Atkins
Respondent: Warden Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?