US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 131 - 140 of 9,535
Arnoff v. Black
as 1:2022cv00375
Petitioner: Bruce Arnoff
Respondent: Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinette v. Hill
as 1:2022cv00356
Petitioner: John I. Robinette, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Leon Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Collins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00360
Plaintiff: Dwaine J. Chapman, Sr.
Defendant: Mark Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Stuart v. Black
as 1:2022cv00362
Petitioner: Donald J. Stuart
Respondent: Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyson v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 3:2022cv00339
Petitioner: Duran Tyson, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carrizales v. Lambert et al
as 4:2022cv00334
Plaintiff: Jose Angel Carrizales
Defendant: Lambert, John and Jane Does, Warden David Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff: Antoine Maurice Moore
Defendant: Judge Gary G. Cook and Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. USA
as 5:2022cv00323
Petitioner: Donyea Nelson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Goode v. USA
as 1:2022cv00325
Petitioner: Charles E. Goode, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Velasco Mejia v. Black
as 3:2022cv00302
Petitioner: Lucas Velasco Mejia
Respondent: Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?