US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,433
Whitacre v. Adult Parole Authority
as 2:2023cv03625
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Whitacre
Defendant:
Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bushner v. Szoke et al
as 2:2023cv03623
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Bushner
Defendant:
Allan Szoke, Todd Diehl, Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everson v. State of Ohio, Department of Job and Family Services (CSEAS)
as 1:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Kwantez R. Everson
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Department of Job and Family Services (CSEAS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bocook v. Eddie et al
as 2:2023cv03481
Plaintiff:
Daryl D. Bocook
Defendant:
Eddie and Annette Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitacre v. Forshey
as 2:2023cv03435
Plaintiff:
Carl E Whitacre
Defendant:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Warden Leunike et al
as 1:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Allan Thompson
Defendant:
Warden Leunike and Ellen Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shine-Johnson et al v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2023cv03233
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Richard Whitman
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dumas v. Warden, Leunike et al
as 1:2023cv00620
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dumas
Defendant:
Warden, Leunike, Mrs. Willis and Mr. N. Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyles v. Sanderfer et al
as 2:2023cv03197
Plaintiff:
Demetrius A Lyles
Defendant:
Ivory Sanderfer and Benjamin Kitzler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dell v. Chambers Smith et al
as 2:2023cv03167
Plaintiff:
David Dell
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, GTL/ViaPath and JPay/Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
