US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 71 - 80 of 80,435
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Antonio Henderson
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02011
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Haywood v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
Lakecia L. Haywood
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armcorp Construction, Inc. v. Talisman Casualty Insurance Company, LLC
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Armcorp Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Talisman Casualty Insurance Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Samaniego v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
David Samaniego
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stagner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02003
Plaintiff:
David H. Stagner
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pearson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01994
Plaintiff:
Michael Pearson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
