US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 836
Phillips v Rogers
as 6:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phillips
Defendant:
Charlie Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hammett v. Pontotoc County Sheriff et al
as 6:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Janice Hammett
Defendant:
Pontotoc County Sheriff and Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Walgreens et al
as 6:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson and Nehemiah H&G Construction
Defendant:
Walgreens, CVS, Rite-Aid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams-Smith v. Farini
as 6:2022cv00085
Defendant:
Donald Wayne Farini and Farino
Plaintiff:
Sandra S. Wilcox Williams Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rahhal v. The East Central Electric Co. et al
as 6:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Birdella Love Rahhal
Defendant:
The East Central Electric Co., Jim Smith and Gary Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Poteau, City of et al
as 6:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Lyle Lawrence
Defendant:
Poteau, City of and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll v. Headding et al
as 6:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Casey Carroll
Defendant:
Blythe Headding and City of Marietta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rahhal v. Liquor Store Owner Highway 48
as 6:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Birdella Love Rahhal
Defendant:
Liquor Store Owner Highway 48 and Liquor Store Owner-Highway 48
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Massey v. Blinken
as 6:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Joe Alan Massey and Joe-Alan
Defendant:
Anthony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Biden et al
as 6:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Defendant:
George Bush, Sr., Joe Biden, Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
