US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 837
Lyons v. City of Ada, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Natosha T. Lyons
Defendant:
The City of Ada, Oklahoma, Tyler W. Pogue, Ryan C. Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azzun v. Oklahoma Osbeltca et al
as 6:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Azzun
Defendant:
Oklahoma Osbeltca, Gaylord Thomas, Keith Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mathieu v. Robertson
as 6:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
James Mathieu
Defendant:
Colton Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hice v. Veterans Administration
as 6:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Hice
Defendant:
Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. James et al
as 6:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phillips
Defendant:
Jesse James, Jessica Brown, David Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fontenot v. Ada, City of et al
as 6:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Karl Fontenot
Defendant:
Ada, City of, Mike Baskin, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiCesare v. Makinson et al
as 6:2021cv00231
Plaintiff:
Joseph Angelo DiCesare
Defendant:
Gary Makinson, Joshua Whitney, FNU Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks v. Department of Human Services
as 6:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
David Meeks
Defendant:
Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeBlue et al v. Six Unknown U.S. Marshals Service Agents et al
as 6:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Geoheidi LeBlue, Estate of Corben Hunter Jones and George Myron Cardinal
Defendant:
Six Unknown U.S. Marshals Service Agents, Darryl LaCounte, Eddy Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Seminole, City of et al
as 6:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cole
Defendant:
Seminole, City of and Michael Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
