US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 840
Busby v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kenton Busby
Defendant:
The State of Oklahoma and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritesman v. Summers
as 6:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Cody Hawke Ritesman
Defendant:
Ron Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prestel v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Prestel
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County of Mcintosh, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nor T. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mark Knutson, David Louthan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hope v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hope
Defendant:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hand v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hand
Defendant:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDermott v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
David Bruce McDermott, II
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Chris Hauger, Julie Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meza v. Quick et al
as 6:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Miguel Meza
Defendant:
Christey Quick, Terri Apala and James Pettit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prestel v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Prestel
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, County of Mcintosh, Kevin Ledbetter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaquez v. Dallis et al
as 6:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Rachel Dallis, Jason Chenault, Johnny Dallis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
