US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 1,187
Young v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2020cv00258
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa, Michael Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Yantis Cornelius Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallis et al v. Dave's Claremore RV et al
as 4:2020cv00245
Defendant:
Dave's Claremore RV and Michael Barras
Plaintiff:
Jason Wallis and Joanna Wallis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burke v. City of Bartlesville et al
as 4:2020cv00244
Defendant:
City of Bartlesville, Officer Jessica Pitts, Officer William Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffman v. Pryer Aerospace, LLC
as 4:2020cv00224
Defendant:
Pryer Aerospace, LLC
Plaintiff:
John Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tyree v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2020cv00205
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tyree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Henderson v. CCH Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00176
Defendant:
CCH Incorporated and Wolters Kluwer United States, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Don Henderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Richter v. Nelson et al
as 4:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Denise Armstrong, Lesli Blazer, Cynthia Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan D Richter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Midgley v. Alsip et al
as 4:2020cv00163
Plaintiff:
Gary Dewayne Midgley
Defendant:
Tammy Alsip and Kenneth Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. PacerMonitor, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00126
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smith
Defendant:
Oklahoma Attorney General, PacerMonitor, LLC and Tulsa County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. IC Bus of Oklahoma, LLC Navistar, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00108
Defendant:
Eddie Enberg, IC Bus of Oklahoma, LLC Navistar, Inc., Randy Betancourt and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
