US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 61 - 70 of 15,447
McCombs v. USA
as 4:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
Sonny Raye McCombs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Whiters v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Marterrell Kemeko Whiters
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
King v. Kaiser et al
as 4:2024cv00568
Defendant:
Center for Employment Opportunities and George Kaiser
Plaintiff:
Carey M King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Conley v. USA
as 4:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
Pamela Kathryn Conley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
King v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00570
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond
Petitioner:
Robert E King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cozart v. The District Court of Tulsa County et al
as 4:2024cv00571
Defendant:
The District Court of Tulsa County and David Guten
Plaintiff:
Delmond Cornell Cozart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Rose Renee McCall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Replevin & Conversion
United States of America v. Thornton
as 4:2024cv00566
Defendant:
Janis Laurel Thornton
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
McCleskey v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00565
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. a foreign for-profit corporation doing business as Sam's Club
Plaintiff:
James McCleskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
