US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,331
Perry v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00480
Petitioner:
Bryan Frank Perry
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swan v. Friot
as 5:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
John Miguel Swan
Respondent:
Stephen P Friot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christensen v. Amonson et al
as 5:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
John E Christensen
Defendant:
Chris Amonson and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brewer v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Felicia Brewer
Defendant:
FNU White, Grace Trahan, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Samuel Earl Norwood
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Nicholson v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Leon Nicholson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Zook, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Garfield Co Court et al
as 5:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
James Robert Blanchard
Defendant:
Garfield Co Court House, Police Station Officers, FNU Haild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daly v. Cole
as 5:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Richard Daly
Respondent:
D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Oklahoma County Jail
as 5:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
