Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,024
Kaseca v. Johnson et al
as 6:2025cv00133
Petitioner:
Michael-James Kaseca
Respondent:
John Raymond Johnson, Diane Ponkilla, Misty McGirt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Officer Sanches et al
as 4:2025cv00198
Petitioner:
Madison Williams
Respondent:
Officer Sanches, Officer Morris, Anthony Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blain v. Rogers
as 5:2025cv00455
Petitioner:
Matthew R Blain
Respondent:
David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Tucker v. Miller
as 6:2025cv00125
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Donnell Tucker
Respondent:
Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Batres v. Oklahoma City Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2025cv00451
Petitioner:
Eddy Batres
Respondent:
Oklahoma City Federal Transfer Center and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Hamilton
as 6:2025cv00120
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deshazer v. Couthan
as 5:2025cv00437
Petitioner:
Johnnie Waldon Deshazer
Respondent:
David Couthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meeks v. Tucker
as 6:2025cv00114
Petitioner:
Lon Brandon Meeks
Respondent:
Joey Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Defreeze v. Rogers
as 5:2025cv00418
Petitioner:
Anthony L Defreeze
Respondent:
David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dodd v. Shropshire et al
as 6:2025cv00110
Petitioner:
Megan Dodd
Respondent:
Tom Nave, Deborah Shropshire, Sandy Crosslin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
