Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,615
Halliwell v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Renee Halliwell
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Terry Tuggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. LNU et al
as 5:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Adams
Defendant:
FNU LNU and Turnkey Health Clinic LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Louie et al
as 6:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Douglas Clinton Weber
Defendant:
Anthony Louie and Amanda Wendell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isbill v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
George Isbill
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stewart
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Dickerson et al
as 5:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Donna R Brandt
Defendant:
Terrace Dickerson, FNU Grant, FNU Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Guten et al
as 4:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Barnett
Defendant:
David Guten and Scott Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Cole et al
as 5:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Anthony Raymone Clark
Defendant:
FNU Cole and Kevin Stitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teague v. Stephens County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Teague
Defendant:
Stephens County Detention Center, Javier Martinez and FNU Dale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Western District of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Terrence Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Western District of Oklahma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
