Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,884
Wilson v. District Court of Tulsa County et al
as 4:2024cv00469
Defendant:
District Court of Tulsa County and Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Plaintiff:
Garry Wayne Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv01027
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and OSBI
Plaintiff:
Develin Dion Ray Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Clock et al
as 5:2024cv01028
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Jimmy Clock and FNU Reynolds
Plaintiff:
Develin Dion Ray Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strange v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv01010
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond
Plaintiff:
Robert Joe Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv01011
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Romero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rayburn v. West Siloam Springs Police
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Rayburn
Defendant:
West Siloam Springs Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Miller et al
as 6:2024cv00357
Defendant:
Sgt. Morrison, Lt. Lease, Mike Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving v. Campbell et al
as 5:2024cv01012
Defendant:
Susan Campbell and David Rogers
Plaintiff:
Luke Irving
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagen v. Broderick et al
as 6:2024cv00351
Defendant:
Peter Broderick and Cherokee County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Charles David Hagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2024cv00352
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, City of Eufaula, Oklahoma, Board of Commissioners for the County of McIntosh and others
Plaintiff:
Ervin Ray Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
