Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,783
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Christine Topping and FNU Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Oklahoma v. Thompson
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Donell Thompson, Jr. doing business as Donnell Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Mendenhall v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jessie Mendenhall
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isham v. Stephens County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Michael Pete Isham
Defendant:
Stephens County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuffin v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Chase Brooks McGuffin
Defendant:
McIntosh County and John Buckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. McIntosh County et al
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jason Grant Dye
Defendant:
McIntosh County and Kevin Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crain v. McIntosh County Board of Supervisors et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tylor Crain
Defendant:
McIntosh County Board of Supervisors, McIntosh County Sheriff Department and Monica Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steudeman v. Waters
as 6:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dustin Steudeman
Defendant:
Kyle Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Turnkey Medical Services
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Sheriff's Department and Turnkey Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Greer et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Shaquille O Williams
Defendant:
FNU Greer, FNU LNU and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
