US District Court for the District of Oregon Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 533
Boyajian Products, LLC v. Enby LLC
as 3:2020cv01991
Plaintiff:
Boyajian Products, LLC
Defendant:
Enby LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Darex, LLC v. J and B Tool Sales, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01731
Defendant:
J and B Tool Sales, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
QH Holdings (Oregon), Inc. v. Quantum Dynamics, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01424
Plaintiff:
QH Holdings (Oregon), Inc.
Defendant:
Quantum Dynamics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Eat Me Lures Inc. v. Cafepress LLC et al
as 6:2020cv01406
Defendant:
Phillip Millner, Fred E. Durham, Robert D. Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Eat Me Lures Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Happy Products, Inc. v. Hroncich Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01294
Defendant:
Nikolino Hroncich, Hroncich Enterprises, LLC doing business as Daily Shop Club, Marino Hroncich and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
VIP Products L.L.C. v. Coastal Farm & Home Supply, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01101
Defendant:
Coastal Farm & Home Supply, LLC and Taj Imports, Inc.
Plaintiff:
VIP Products L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Garan, Incorporated et al v. Manimal, LLC
as 3:2020cv00623
Defendant:
Manimal, LLC
Plaintiff:
Garan, Incorporated and Garan Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry v. The Hemp Grange et al
as 1:2020cv00600
Plaintiff:
The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry
Defendant:
Thomas Dubiel and The Hemp Grange
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Blocker v. Google Nest Inc.
as 3:2020cv00547
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Blocker
Defendant:
Google Nest Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
International Gold Star, Inc. v. Global Importing Group, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00197
Plaintiff:
International Gold Star, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Importing Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.