US District Court for the District of Oregon Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,312
A. A. v. Echtenkamp et al
as 3:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
A. A.
Defendant:
Emily Echtenkamp, Loren Calkins and Leonard Cain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen et al v. Destination XL Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Allen and Elaine Higgins
Defendant:
Destination XL Group, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mitchell v. Kott et al
as 6:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Jeannene Mitchell
Defendant:
Shelly Kott, US Bancorp, Sharon Kott Prosise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LaTulippe v. Oregon Medical Board et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Steven LaTulippe
Defendant:
Oregon Medical Board, Kathleen Harder, Ali Mageehon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis, Jr. v. Safeway, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Safeway Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
S.Q. v. Echtenkamp et al
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
S. Q.
Defendant:
Emily Echtenkamp, Loren Calkins, Juan Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. City of Portland
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Ash
Defendant:
City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Van Loo Fiduciary Services LLC v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Van Loo Fiduciary Services LLC
Defendant:
City of Portland and Christopher Sathoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oravetz v. Well Fargo et al
as 6:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Well Fargo, Oak Harbor WA and Sequim WA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oravetz v. Tamera Lundran
as 6:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Tamera Lundran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
