US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 4,335
Murray v. Black Rose Auto
as 6:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Black Rose Auto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T. Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County DA's Office
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County DA's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Key Bank & Accsets
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Johnny Curathus Murray
Defendant:
Key Bank & Accsets
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beyer v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Bryan Martin Beyer
Defendant:
Deschutes County, Michael Molan, Andrew Farey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik v. Reed College et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Keith Shazad Malik
Defendant:
Reed College, John Young Taft, Kater Murch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bogosian v. Washington County Courts
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
James Leroy Bogosian
Defendant:
Washington County Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Fhuere et al
as 2:2023cv01984
Plaintiff:
Harlan James Hale
Defendant:
Corey Fhuere, Dr. B.T. Smith, K. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Target Store Corporation at 205 Mall et al
as 3:2023cv01982
Plaintiff:
Frederick Owen Jefferson
Defendant:
Target Store Corporation at 205 Mall and Kaleb Rethwisch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.B. v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
J.B.
Defendant:
Levi Gray, Jayson Leak, Paul Kizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
