US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 141 - 150 of 4,350
Murray v. Conovers
as 6:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Judge Conovers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. McAlpin et al
as 6:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Judge McAlpin, Erik T Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00049
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Erick T Knapp, Lane County DAs Office and Springfield PD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County Adult Corrections
as 6:2024cv00047
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Lane County Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. DA's Office et al
as 6:2024cv00041
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: DA's Office, Erik T. Knap, Judge McAlpine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Black Rose Auto
as 6:2024cv00042
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Black Rose Auto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Lane County, Erik T. Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County DA's Office
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: Johnny C Murray
Defendant: Lane County DA's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Key Bank & Accsets
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: Johnny Curathus Murray
Defendant: Key Bank & Accsets
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beyer v. Deschutes County et al
as 6:2024cv00037
Plaintiff: Bryan Martin Beyer
Defendant: Deschutes County, Michael Molan, Andrew Farey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?