U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 330,041
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MORRETT v. BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPES, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv01309
Plaintiff:
GREG MORRETT
Defendant:
BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPES, LLC and BRIGHTVIEW HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ELLIOTT v. LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
as 2:2025cv01300
Plaintiff:
KENNETH W. ELLIOTT, JR.
Defendant:
LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
THORPE v. DUDEK
as 2:2025cv01294
Plaintiff:
GARY MATTHEW THORPE
Defendant:
LELAND DUDEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
COLON v. DUDEK
as 5:2025cv01281
Plaintiff:
MAYRA JOHELY SALGADO COLON
Defendant:
LELAND DUDEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CARLISLE v. NOVACARE REHABILITATION SERVICES ET, AL.
as 2:2025cv01293
Plaintiff:
KAREN CARLISLE
Defendant:
NOVACARE REHABILITATION SERVICES ET, AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ALLEN v. NELSON
as 2:2025cv01287
Plaintiff:
MIYOSHI ALLEN
Defendant:
BRENICE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
