U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 27,547
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SCOTT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2025cv00837
Plaintiff:
STANLEY LYNN SCOTT
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and NORRISTOWN COURT HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. ORPHANS COURT PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2025cv00838
Plaintiff:
JOY LUCRETIA CLARK
Defendant:
ORPHANS COURT PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: JOHNNY STOKES, III
as 2:2025cv00859
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY STOKES, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL et al v. KMEL et al
as 5:2025cv00836
Plaintiff:
AVEMARIE MITCHELL and BRITNEY FLYNN
Defendant:
KMEL and CURT PETER MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LLOYD v. WOLF & KLINE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC. et al
as 5:2025cv00835
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Defendant:
WOLF & KLINE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC., PARADISE MEADOWS LLC, EAGLE LAWN CARE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
