US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Prison Condition Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 5,994
IN RE: NATHAN HACK
as 2:2024cv02176
Unknown: NATHAN HACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GUTHRIE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02170
Defendant: CPL GUTHRIE
Plaintiff: DION M. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD
as 2:2024cv02218
Plaintiff: MATTHEW ALWARD
Defendant: FCI OXFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALEY v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv02082
Plaintiff: ALEX HAYDN HALEY
Defendant: COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL., INC., KAREN MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: MATTHEW ALWARD
as 2:2024cv02202
Plaintiff: MATTHEW ALWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS et al v. HARRY
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff: AARON V. SIMS and DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant: DR. LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KONATA v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff: MATTHEWS KONATA
Defendant: RAMOS, ABDUR-RAZZAQ, HOSKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD et al
as 2:2024cv01883
Plaintiff: MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Defendant: FCI OXFORD, LT. BROESCH and WARDEN EMMERICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Defendant: PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 2:2024cv01813
Plaintiff: DUPREE WILLIAMS
Defendant: GREGORY BRIGGZ, C.O. ROBINSON, SAVASIA CARABALLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?