U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 6,102
RAGGAZINO v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 2:2024cv06926
Plaintiff:
ANAYE RAGGAZINO
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, CHESTER COUNTY PRISON and H.I.G. CAPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKUBU v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 5:2024cv06929
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN AKUBU
Defendant:
A. JACKSON, GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: MICHAEL WELLS
as 2:2024cv06881
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: DRAUGHN
as 2:2024cv06890
Plaintiff:
REGINALD DRAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: OLIMPO
as 2:2024cv06892
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ALEXANDER OLIMPO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. BUTTERWORTH et al
as 5:2024cv06884
Defendant:
RUSHIN, BUTTERWORTH and UNKNOWN C.O.'S NAMES WHILE IN SEGREGATION
Plaintiff:
VINCENT J. SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DICK v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06760
Plaintiff:
COREY A. DICK
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (BCCF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DETTY v. BECK et al

as 2:2024cv06736
Defendant:
SERGEANT CRUZ, CORRECTIONS OFFICER HICKMOND, LIEUTENANT BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL DETTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al

as 5:2024cv06741
Defendant:
JOSH LEADBETTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., CLIFF KNAPPENBERGER and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRIUS BASHIR ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERR v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON

as 5:2024cv06686
Plaintiff:
CAILEN HERR
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.