US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,940
IN RE: MATTHEW ALWARD
as 2:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS et al v. HARRY
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
AARON V. SIMS and DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KONATA v. RAMOS et al
as 2:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
MATTHEWS KONATA
Defendant:
RAMOS, ABDUR-RAZZAQ, HOSKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD et al
as 2:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Defendant:
FCI OXFORD, LT. BROESCH and WARDEN EMMERICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 2:2024cv01813
Plaintiff:
DUPREE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GREGORY BRIGGZ, C.O. ROBINSON, SAVASIA CARABALLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DRAYTON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEMS et al
as 2:2024cv01800
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL A. DRAYTON, II
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEMS, PHILADELPHIA PRISON DEPARTMENT, HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS PRISON (HOC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
MARCUS A. ROSARIO
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and INMATE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: SMITH
as 2:2024cv01787
Plaintiff:
JERRY SMITH, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
