US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 74
HART v. TRIOG, et al
as 2:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
MARY HART
Defendant:
TRIOG, BOROUGH OF EDGEWOOD and COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
WRIGHT v. NOCITO
as 2:2023cv02068
Plaintiff:
RAKEN RAYHEEM WRIGHT
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. NOCITO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
FRANTZ et al v. COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC
as 2:2020cv00187
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE D. FRANTZ and LOIS E. FRANTZ
Defendant:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SMALIS et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2019cv01609
Plaintiff:
LIPSOSS COPRP CONSTRUCTORS, DESPINA SMALIS and ANASTASIOS SMALIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, DONNA MURPHY, STEVEN MALNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMALIS et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
DEPT OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS, DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PITTSBURGH and others
Plaintiff:
LIPSOSS CORP CONSTRUCTORS and ANASTASIOS ERNEST SMALIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROVER PIPELINE LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO. PA-WA-HL-023.130 COMPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 1.63 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OVER A PARCEL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TOTALING 20 ACRES, MO et al
as 2:2019cv00701
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO. PA-WA-HL-023.130 COMPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 1.63 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OVER A PARCEL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TOTALING 20 ACRES, MO, ANY UNKNOWN OWNERS and LARA CICCOLELLA
Plaintiff:
ROVER PIPELINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
ROVER PIPELINE LLC v. ROVER TRACCT NO. PA-WA-HL-004.500 COPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 1.3600 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OVER A PAREL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TOTALING 49.571 ACRES et al
as 2:2019cv00292
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO.PA-WA-HL-012.20-ATWS COMPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 4.3600 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,OVER A PARCEL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TOTALING 125.462, ROVER TRACT NO. PA-WA-HL-020.000 COMPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 3.0376 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OVER A PARCEL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TOTALING 120.041 AC, ROVER TRACT NO. PA-WA-HL-023.140 COMPRISED OF TEMPORARY EASEMENT(S) TOTALING 0.0900 ACRES, ORE OR LESS, OVER A PARCEL OF LAND IN HANOVER TOWNSHIP, WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TOTALING 20.00 ACRES and others
Plaintiff:
ROVER PIPELINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
IN RE: CONDEMNATION BY THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR STATE ROUTE 0022, SECTION 034, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF FRANKSTOWN
as 3:2018cv00057
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NATIONAL FUEL GAS SUPPLY CORPORATION v. AN EXCLUSIVE NATURAL GAS STORAGE EASEMENT BENEATH 50 ACRES, MORE OR LESS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF ST. MARYS, ELK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, OWNED BY MARK E. RUPPRECHT AND ANNETTE L. RUPPRECHT et al
as 1:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL FUEL GAS SUPPLY CORPORATION
Defendant:
AN EXCLUSIVE NATURAL GAS STORAGE EASEMENT BENEATH 50 ACRES, MORE OR LESS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF ST. MARYS, ELK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, OWNED BY MARK E. RUPPRECHT AND ANNETTE L. RUPPRECHT , MARK E. RUPPRECHT and ANNETTE L. RUPPRECHT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC. v. AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20-INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE ACROSS PROPERTIES IN WASHINGTON COUNTY AND ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, OWNED BY MCC INTERNATIONAL, INC. (PARCEL I et al
as 2:2017cv01297
Plaintiff:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC.
Defendant:
AN EASEMENT TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A 20-INCH GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE ACROSS PROPERTIES IN WASHINGTON COUNTY AND ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, OWNED BY MCC INTERNATIONAL, INC. (PARCEL I and UNKNOWN PERSONS AND INTERESTED PARTIES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
