US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,332
HARRISON v. ACKER et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
JIHAAD AMORE HARRISON
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PETER C. ACKER and ATTORNEY JAMES REX BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANT v. PIRL et al
as 2:2023cv01678
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GRANT
Defendant:
C.O. PIRL, C.O. JOHN DOE, LT. HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and MICHAEL CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DRAUCKER v. COMM. OF PENNA et al
as 3:2023cv00213
Defendant:
CORTEZ BELL, COMM. OF PENNA, PAUL E. CHERRY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DRAUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. WITT et al
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
JAMAR MATTHEWS
Defendant:
MS. WITT, RNS CREVELING, MS. SHOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. FRALEY et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
JAMAR MATTHEWS
Defendant:
FRALEY, LEDAKA, SUPERINTENDENT HAINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MASTEN v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LEE MASTEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RUBINOSKI v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY DA et al
as 2:2023cv01549
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RUBINOSKI
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY DA, OFFICE OF THE DA EMPLOYEES and ALLEGHENY OFFICE PEOPLE ALLSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. WALKER et al
as 1:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
TRAVON JOHNSON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. C. WALKER and J. DUPONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGILL v. WARDEN HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
KEITH B. MCGILL
Defendant:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
