US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,397
STOCKTON v. PSA J.JADLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
PSA J. JADLOCK and CAPTAIN JADLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. BRYNER
as 2:2024cv01013
Petitioner:
Augustus Whitehead
Respondent:
SCI-Greene Employee Bryner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DAVIS
Defendant:
D. KNIGHT, K. STURGIS and SCI ALBION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GIDDINGS v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00922
Defendant:
LEVI GIDDINGS, LAUREL HARRY and TAMMY FERGERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE v. ODDO et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
JEAN DOE
Defendant:
L. J. ODDO, V. CAHILLI and CHIEF OF SECURITY R. BOLLINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. BOLIN et al
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
JARARD AMOS TAYLOR
Defendant:
NINA BOLIN, URSULA DEAN, STERLING HICKERSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. AINSLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
S. JALIL REED
Defendant:
C.O. AINSLEY, C.O. COOPER and SGT NAHLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANE v. RUCINSKI
as 2:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
MR. DUSTIN HYRUM LANE
Defendant:
STATE TROOPER MATTHEW RUCINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. HURL
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS WHITE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER HURL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
LANE v. BOOKER et al
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN HYRUM LANE
Defendant:
BETH BOOKER, ABIGAIL CONKLIN, JOYCE A. HATFIELD-WISE, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
