US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 125
PEDERSON v. THE COMMUNITIES AT INDIAN HAVEN, INC.
as 3:2020cv00124
Defendant:
THE COMMUNITIES AT INDIAN HAVEN, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMIE PEDERSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BURBACH v. ARCONIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv00723
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOSPEH BURBACH, JR.
Defendant:
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and ARCONIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CHRISTOPHERSON v. POLYCONCEPT NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00545
Defendant:
Adam Buchbinder, POLYCONCEPT NORTH AMERICA, INC., Brenda Scholl and others
Plaintiff:
rosalyn christopherson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
JENKINS v. SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2020cv00501
Defendant:
SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
AISLYNN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DAVIS v. FASTENAL COMPANY
as 1:2019cv00330
Plaintiff:
CHRISTEN DUPRE DAVIS
Defendant:
FASTENAL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2616
BIGNEY v. HIGHLANDS SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2019cv01351
Plaintiff:
DR. HEATHER BIGNEY
Defendant:
HIGHLANDS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DAVIS v. PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES
as 2:2019cv01316
Defendant:
PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN N. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
SICILIA v. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01292
Defendant:
NORTH STRABANE RETIREMENT VILLAGE, LLC and COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
DEBRA SICILIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
SHOOK v. GCA SERVICES GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01199
Defendant:
GCA SERVICES GROUP, INC. and ABM INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SHOOK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
LAVEING v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2019cv01095
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
SHAWN LAVEING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
