Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 722
LARKE III v. TASTY BAKING COMPANY
as 2:2022cv05114
Plaintiff:
LUCIUS LARKE III
Defendant:
TASTY BAKING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Barrick v. Cumberland County Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2022cv02005
Plaintiff:
Chelsey Barrick
Defendant:
Cumberland County Department of Public Safety and County of Cumberland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Flasher v. JLG Industries, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01956
Plaintiff:
Bradley Flasher
Defendant:
JLG Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
PALMER v. STEWARD SHARON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
as 2:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
BRENDA PALMER
Defendant:
STEWARD SHARON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
STOLL v. ARMSTRONG FLOORING, INC.
as 5:2022cv04414
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA K STOLL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG FLOORING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
MOORE v. UPMC EAST
as 2:2022cv01468
Plaintiff:
ROSALIE JONES MOORE
Defendant:
UPMC EAST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
SPADA v. INSTANT BRANDS, LLC
as 2:2022cv01425
Plaintiff:
DEREK SPADA, CORELLE BRANDS, LLC and WORLD KITCHEN, LLC
Defendant:
INSTANT BRANDS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
SELBY v. SIMITREE ACQUISITION LLC
as 2:2022cv04011
Plaintiff:
FATIMAH SELBY
Defendant:
SIMITREE ACQUISITION LLC
WALLS v. MILLER EDGE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03596
Plaintiff:
MR. MARK WALL
Defendant:
MILLER EDGE, INC., MR. JOHN CAGGIANO and MR. TIM CASTELLO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Valentin v. Highmark, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
Ashley Valentin
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
