Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 12,814
SULLIVAN v. GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES LC et al
as 2:2024cv01244
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SULLIVAN
Defendant:
GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES LC and MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
HIBBARD v. GENTLE ANGELS CAREGIVING SERVICES LLC
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Amber Hibbard
Defendant:
Gentle Angels Caregiving Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mayan v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01203
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mayan
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
NAGY v. ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
CHARLES NAGY
Defendant:
ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE, LLC and THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,
WAGNER v. Ungerer & Company et al
as 5:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
KELSEY WAGNER
Defendant:
Ungerer & Company and Givaudan, SA.
WAGNER v. Ungerer & Company et al
as 2:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
KELSEY WAGNER
Defendant:
Ungerer & Company and Givaudan, SA.
KONOPKA v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
STANLEY KONOPKA
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
THOMAS v. RED & BLUE DICE CORPORATION et al
as 5:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
MALIK THOMAS
Defendant:
RED & BLUE DICE CORPORATION, RED & BLUE DICE 2 CORPORATION, AZHARUL ISLAM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ADAMS et al v. RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ADAMS and CONRAD EVERETT
Defendant:
RHOMBUS SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PRAIZNER v. RED & BLUE DICE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
JOHN PRAIZNER
Defendant:
RED & BLUE DICE CORPORATION, RED & BLUE DICE 2 CORPORATION, AZHARUL ISLAM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
