District Court Cases in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 428,629
Bevins v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03330
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK RESEARCH CENTER SEATTLE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Sherri Bevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
STEWART v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03337
Plaintiff:
CRAIG STEWART
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 133
HOOKS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03340
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
LATOYA HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 133
INGRAM v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03341
Plaintiff:
LISA INGRAM
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 133
CHANNELL v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03347
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CHANNELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DIPALO v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03348
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOHN J DIPALO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HILDRETH v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03349
Plaintiff:
FRANK HILDRETH
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
HICKS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03350
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK A/S and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GERALD HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BONILLA v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03351
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
GABRIELA BONILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KIRKLAND v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03352
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
DANNY JO KIRKLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
