U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 290
Johnson v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2025cv00221
Petitioner:
Ezekial Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
G.M.G. v. Trump et al
as 1:2025cv00195
Petitioner:
G.M.G.
Respondent:
Donald J. Trump, Pamela Jo Bondi, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Grundy v. Salisbury, Jr.
as 1:2025cv00171
Petitioner:
Raymond Grundy
Respondent:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Bondi et al
as 1:2025cv00158
Petitioner:
John Sullivan
Respondent:
Pamela Jo Bondi and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tejada v. State of Alaska
as 1:2025cv00071
Petitioner:
Alex Tejada
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Quaweay v. Salisbury
as 1:2025cv00045
Petitioner:
John Quaweay
Respondent:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tassone v. Director Salisbury
as 1:2025cv00031
Petitioner:
Gary Tassone
Respondent:
Wayne T. Salisbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adorno v. Nessigner
as 1:2024cv00500
Respondent:
Warden Michael Nessigner
Petitioner:
Hector Adorno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Oliveira v. Salisbury
as 1:2024cv00405
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury
Petitioner:
James F. Oliveira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliveira v. Salisbury
as 1:2024cv00374
Respondent:
Wayne T. Salisbury
Petitioner:
James F. Oliveira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
