US District Court for the District of Rhode Island Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 249
Moore v. Dobbs
as 1:2021cv00293
Petitioner:
Joshua Moore, J.J., Jay
Respondent:
Dobbs
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Neufville v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2021cv00275
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague
Petitioner:
Eric G. Neufville
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Department of Children, Youth and Families v. Vilbon
as 1:2021cv00272
Plaintiff:
Department of Children, Youth and Families
Defendant:
Carline Vilbon
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
DiMuccio v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2021cv00221
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague
Petitioner:
Domenic R. DiMuccio, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2021cv00191
Petitioner:
Gerardo E. Martinez
Respondent:
Patricia A. Coyne-Fague, State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2021cv00125
Petitioner:
Amos A. Robinson
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frady v. Youngs et al
as 1:2021cv00087
Respondent:
J Patrick Youngs, III, State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Thomas V. Frady, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grabowski v. Martin et al
as 1:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Wing Chau, John Doe, Warden Daniel Martin
Petitioner:
PIOTR JAN GRABOWSKI
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fantel v. Fourth Division District Court et al
as 1:2020cv00479
Petitioner:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Respondent:
Fourth Division District Court, James J. Caroulo
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Graham v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2020cv00393
Petitioner:
Roger Graham
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
