US District Court for the District of Rhode Island Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,117
Liberatore v. Nessinger
as 1:2023cv00384
Petitioner:
Thomas Liberatore
Respondent:
Michael Nessinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fuentes v. Salisbury
as 1:2023cv00379
Petitioner:
Jesus D Fuentes
Respondent:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Kane et al
as 1:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Kimberly Kane, Christopher Cornell, Wayne Salisbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Botelho v. RIDOC et al
as 1:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Joseph Botelho
Defendant:
RIDOC, Robert Abbey Achindiba, MD, Eunice Bosede Kola-Idowu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tassone v. Director Salisbury
as 1:2023cv00280
Petitioner:
Gary Tassone
Respondent:
Director Salisbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boudreau v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2023cv00259
Petitioner:
Jason Boudreau
Respondent:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lastarza v. Neronha et al
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Lastarza
Defendant:
Peter F. Neronha and Patricia A. Coyne-Fague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sennon v. Houston House
as 1:2023cv00231
Petitioner:
Joel P. Sennon
Respondent:
Houston House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fuentes v. Salisbury
as 1:2023cv00228
Petitioner:
Jesus D Fuentes
Respondent:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lucas
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Peter F. Nerhona, Wing Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
