US District Court for the District of Rhode Island Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,165
Roldan v. Larangeira
as 1:2024cv00390
Defendant:
David Larangeira
Plaintiff:
Luis Roldan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mangru v. Larangeira
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mangru
Defendant:
David Larangeira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliveira v. Salisbury
as 1:2024cv00374
Respondent:
Wayne T. Salisbury
Petitioner:
James F. Oliveira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boudreau v. USA
as 1:2024cv00364
Petitioner:
Jason D. Boudreau
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Munir v. Suttell
as 1:2024cv00359
Defendant:
Paul A Suttell
Plaintiff:
Hasim Munir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mosley v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00299
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rachel Bray, Rhode Island Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shepard v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2024cv00301
Defendant:
M. Taylor, Kathy Lyons, Billie-Jo Gallagher and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Shepard and Joey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. McKee
as 1:2024cv00283
Defendant:
Daniel J. McKee
Plaintiff:
John Pacheco, Jr., Jose Garcia, Frank Sanchez-Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betters v. Moe et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Defendant:
James Moe, Lynda Aul, Colin Powell and others
Plaintiff:
George Betters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Wilson M. Gonzales
Defendant:
Rui Diniz, Richard Thompson, Todd Harbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.