Rhode Island Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,094
Broccoli et al v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00428
Defendant:
David Rodio, Paul McAuley, Anthony Moretti and others
Plaintiff:
Davide C. Broccoli
Counter-Defendant:
Davide C. Broccoli
Counter-Claimant:
Kenneth Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 790 Rehabilitation of Labor
Blackie v. Hammond et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Defendant:
City of Woonsocket and Timothy Hammond
Plaintiff:
Mack Blackie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Townsend et al
as 1:2024cv00424
Defendant:
C/O Renee Townsend, Lt Perry and C/O Levassuer
Plaintiff:
Luis A Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Rhode Island et al v. Zarlenga
as 1:2024cv00426
Defendant:
Lori A. Zarlenga
Plaintiff:
BHDDH and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00422
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00412
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00410
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
