South Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 366
Turner v. QC Franchise Group LLC
as 7:2023cv05910
Plaintiff:
Brandice Turner
Defendant:
QC Franchise Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Harrison v. County of Anderson
as 8:2023cv05875
Plaintiff:
Melissa Harrison
Defendant:
County of Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Lane v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC
as 9:2023cv05803
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lane
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hill v. Whitten Center et al
as 6:2023cv05731
Plaintiff:
Marteebia Hill
Defendant:
Whitten Center, Elizabeth Redd and Craig Byrd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
LaDuke v. The Boeing Company
as 2:2023cv05698
Plaintiff:
Derrick R. LaDuke
Defendant:
The Boeing Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Moody v. So-Pak-Co Inc
as 4:2023cv05290
Plaintiff:
Karen Moody
Defendant:
So-Pak-Co Inc doing business as Sopakco Packaging
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Elmore v. McLeod Health
as 4:2023cv04964
Plaintiff:
Markisha Elmore
Defendant:
McLeod Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Sanders v. Family Dollar Stores of South Carolina, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04460
Plaintiff:
Eric Alan Sanders
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of South Carolina, Inc., Dollar Tree, Inc., Shantell Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Fulton v. Superior Machine Co. of S.C., LLC
as 4:2023cv04381
Plaintiff:
Bennie Fulton
Defendant:
Superior Machine Co. of S.C., LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Velez v. Plastic Omnium Auto Exteriors, LLC.
as 6:2023cv03989
Plaintiff:
Oscar Velez
Defendant:
Plastic Omnium Auto Exteriors, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
