South Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 345
Speights v. Harbor Freight Tools Distribution et al
as 4:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Roln Speights
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools Distribution and Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Ward v. Bosch Rexroth Corporation
as 6:2022cv04552
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ward
Defendant:
Bosch Rexroth Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Berman v. Harsco Corporation
as 3:2022cv04173
Plaintiff:
Michael Berman
Defendant:
Harsco Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
McMillian v. Darlington, City of
as 4:2022cv04063
Plaintiff:
William E McMillian
Defendant:
Darlington, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Jackson v. Haile Gold Mine, Inc.
as 3:2022cv03838
Plaintiff:
Deiaokiki Jackson
Defendant:
Haile Gold Mine, Inc. doing business as Oceana Gold Haile Goldmine
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Saffer v. Trident Technical College
as 2:2022cv03776
Plaintiff:
Camille H. Saffer
Defendant:
Trident Technical College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Downings v. TreeHouse Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03679
Plaintiff:
George Downings
Defendant:
TreeHouse Foods, Inc., American Italian Pasta Company and Winland Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Bing v. Butler Chrysler Dodge Jeep, LLC et al
as 9:2022cv03643
Plaintiff:
Tommy A. Bing
Defendant:
Butler Chrysler Dodge Jeep, LLC, Butler Automotive, Inc. and Butler Automotive Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Massey v. Prisma Health
as 6:2022cv03395
Plaintiff:
Shelly Massey
Defendant:
Prisma Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gleaton v. Cayce, City of
as 3:2022cv03342
Plaintiff:
James Gleaton
Defendant:
Cayce, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
