South Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 345
Estrich v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 8:2022cv03283
Plaintiff:
Arthur Estrich
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Lawver v. Owens Corning Composite Materials, LLC
as 1:2022cv03133
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lawver
Defendant:
Owens Corning Composite Materials, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
McDonald v. BMW Manufacturing Co LLC
as 7:2022cv03040
Plaintiff:
David M McDonald
Defendant:
BMW Manufacturing Co LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Inabinet v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health
as 3:2022cv03029
Plaintiff:
Crystal T. Inabinet
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Browning v. City of Union
as 7:2022cv02845
Plaintiff:
Tamika Browning
Defendant:
City of Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Smith v. Graziano et al
as 2:2022cv02821
Plaintiff:
Joyce Smith
Defendant:
Kristin Graziano, Ameed Sad and Charleston County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wooles v. Countybank
as 8:2022cv02808
Plaintiff:
Michael Wooles
Defendant:
Countybank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Reynolds v. Summey et al
as 2:2022cv02649
Plaintiff:
Delisa M. Reynolds
Defendant:
Keith R. Summey, Deborah Crosby Summey, North Charleston, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Snow v. Genesis Eldercare Rehabilitation Services, LLC.
as 3:2022cv01794
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Snow
Defendant:
Genesis Eldercare Rehabilitation Services and Genesis Eldercare Rehabilitation Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
