US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Bartol v. City of Chattanooga
as 1:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BARTOL
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Harden v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
Harold Harden
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc and Volkswagen Group of America Chattanooga Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Kuntz v. Elwood Staffing Services, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00283
Plaintiff:
Melissa Kuntz
Defendant:
Elwood Staffing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Gillespie v. Mueller Water Products, Inc. (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00228
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gillespie
Defendant:
Mueller Water Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jones v. Lodge Manufacturing Company
as 1:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jones
Defendant:
Lodge Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Smith v. Chattanooga Orthopaedic Group, P.C.
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Staci Smith
Defendant:
Chattanooga Orthopaedic Group, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hilton v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority d/b/a Erlanger Health System (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00144
Defendant:
Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority d/b/a Erlanger Health System and Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority doing business as Erlanger Health System
Plaintiff:
Patricia F. Hilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hart v. 7-Eleven, Inc. (JRG3)
as 1:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Constance R. Hart
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hackworth v. Harriman Utility Board (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hackworth
Defendant:
Harriman Utility Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Zuback v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00319
Plaintiff:
Tania Zuback
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
