US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 1,521 - 1,530 of 35,367
Hickel v. Westover
as 3:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Stefan Hickel
Defendant:
Kevin Westover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Carl Jones
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frazier v. Breville USA, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Hannah Frazier
Defendant:
Breville USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Goldman v. RealPage, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jason Goldman
Defendant:
RealPage, Inc., BH Management Services, LLC, Cortland Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Brasfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Gregory Brasfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Green v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alma Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
