US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Civil Rights Cases
Cases 231 - 240 of 2,311
Griham v. Memphis City Police Department City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02506
Plaintiff:
Justin griham, Emmanuel Meniru, Justin Jaico Griham and others
Defendant:
Memphis City Police Department City of Memphis, Taiyuan Brooks, A Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinnie v. Hardeman County, TN et al
as 1:2021cv01115
Plaintiff:
Larry McKinnie
Defendant:
Hardeman County, TN, Wesley Lovelace and Nicholas McCarroll
Not Classified By Court:
Billy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Juvenile Court et al
as 2:2021cv02509
Plaintiff:
Tamera E. Ingram
Defendant:
Juvenile Court, Officer Harlin, Eric Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Bridgeforth et al
as 2:2021cv02505
Plaintiff:
Tamera E. Ingram
Defendant:
Dedra Bridgeforth, Eddie Jones, Carolyn Addison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Lipman et al
as 2:2021cv02499
Plaintiff:
Tamera E. Ingram
Defendant:
Ira Lipman, Charmiane Claxton and Brian L. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Haven Hill MHP
as 2:2021cv02492
Plaintiff:
Melody Ann Taylor
Defendant:
Haven Hill MHP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemp v. Tennessee Child Support
as 1:2021cv01108
Plaintiff:
James A. Kemp
Defendant:
Tennessee Child Support
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millen v. Brewer's Body Shop et al
as 2:2021cv02480
Plaintiff:
Kevin Millen
Defendant:
Brewer's Body Shop and Curtis E. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendall v. Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02478
Plaintiff:
Sharrika D Kendall
Defendant:
Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Garner v. Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02477
Plaintiff:
Linda K Garner
Defendant:
Concorde Career Colleges, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
