Tennessee Social Security Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,858
Allen v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01223
Plaintiff:
Brian Allen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Dial v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Robert Dial
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sangster v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Angela Sangster
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Davis v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Robert Lynn Davis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Kathleen Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Alice Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and General Counsel SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clark v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01209
Plaintiff:
Justin Clark
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Montgomery v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
Terry Montgomery
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
McKinney v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Brenda McKinney
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
King v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Michael King
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
