US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 131 - 140 of 69,063
DOBECKA v. TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY
as 6:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOBECKA
Defendant:
TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe (M.K.) v. G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (M.K.)
Defendant:
G6 HOSPITALITY, LLC, G6 Hospitality IP, LLC, G6 Hospitality Property, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Farooq v. Standard Chartered Bank
as 4:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Tariq Farooq
Defendant:
Standard Chartered Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luxottica Group, S.p.A., an Italian Corporation et al v. Abdelrahman et al
as 4:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group, S.p.A., an Italian Corporation and Oakley, Inc., a Washington Corporation
Defendant:
Hosam Abdelrahman and Rogena Abdelrahman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Wearable Shoe Tree, LLC v. Does 1-601
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Wearable Shoe Tree, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-601
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Langston v. Internal Revenue Services
as 4:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Ronia Langston
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanford v. AT&T
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Mary Loechel Sanford
Defendant:
AT&T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd. v. REC Solar Holdings AS
as 2:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
REC Solar Holdings AS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
