US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 4,763
Knoll v. Watt et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Keith Knoll
Defendant:
Tom Watt, Kristina Bowen and Bill Magers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bass v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Linh N. Bass and Monglinh Ngo Bass
Defendant:
Joshua Jackson, Jason Schmoker, Kenneth Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moyle v. City of Princeton, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mark Moyle
Defendant:
City of Princeton, Texas, Derek Borg and Brianna Chacon
Intervenor:
Matthew Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Maponga et al v. Walker et al
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Stansly Maponga and Christina Maponga
Defendant:
Barnett Walker, Vincent J Venegoni, Constable, Precinct 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boyd v. Jasper County, Texas
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Steven Boyd
Defendant:
Jasper County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
