US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 9,338
Nieves-Perez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
Felipe Nieves-Perez
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Longoria v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
David G. Longoria
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2023cv00378
Petitioner:
John James Baker
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lewis vs Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
Andrew Lewis
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Barnhill v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Kyle Edwin Barnhill
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Director
as 6:2023cv00505
Petitioner:
Joshua Calhoun
Respondent:
TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prox v. Colbert
as 6:2023cv00511
Petitioner:
Kevin Devon Prox
Respondent:
Warden FNU Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ortega v. Warden FCI Texarkana
as 5:2023cv00107
Petitioner:
Jose Ortega
Respondent:
Warden FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ruiz v. U S Government
as 5:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Rafael Verdejo Ruiz
Respondent:
U S Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gautreaux v. Warden, FPC Beaumont
as 1:2023cv00370
Petitioner:
Jase Gautreaux
Respondent:
Warden, FPC Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
