US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 7,319
Yarbrough v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01138
Petitioner:
Jimmy Don Yarbrough
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mora v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01156
Petitioner:
Wilibaldo Mora
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Land v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv01157
Petitioner:
Joshua Land and Joshua L. Land
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01219
Petitioner:
Richard Vonzell Hawes
Respondent:
Warden FNU Almonza and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv01156
Petitioner:
Dennis Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vichique v. State of Texas
as 5:2022cv01224
Petitioner:
Henry Vichique
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rudluff v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01139
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Steven Rudluff
Respondent:
FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv01141
Petitioner:
Tony Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tillman v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01137
Petitioner:
Darian Tillman and Darian Anthony Tillman
Respondent:
FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aronofsky v. Rosalez
as 1:2022cv01140
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Aronofsky
Respondent:
Warden FNU Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
