US District Court for the Western District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 7,593
Clay v. Collier
as 6:2023cv00848
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cortez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01523
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Cortez
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01512
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sterling v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00842
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Sterling
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MacWilliams v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv01510
Petitioner:
Jessie MacWilliams
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clay v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Cueto et al
as 5:2023cv01501
Petitioner:
David Preston Murphy
Respondent:
Edmundo Cueto and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schlott v. Warden FPC La Tuna
as 3:2023cv00445
Petitioner:
Douglas Edward Schlott
Respondent:
Warden FPC La Tuna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Doyle v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
Rico Doyle
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Cooper and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Warden FPC La Tuna
as 3:2023cv00431
Petitioner:
Dwayne Keith Anderson
Respondent:
Warden FPC La Tuna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
