Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 15,215
Lori v. InsuranceHub Leavitt Agency, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01426
Plaintiff:
Lori Adams
Defendant:
InsuranceHub Leavitt Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Greene v. Allen
as 4:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Samantha E. Greene
Defendant:
Officer Bryan Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sessanga v. City of DeSoto et al
as 3:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Charles Sessanga
Defendant:
City of DeSoto and J. Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanna v. Cangshan Cutlery Company
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR HANNA
Defendant:
CANGSHAN CUTLERY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Reyes v. Harris County
as 4:2024cv01415
Plaintiff:
Art Reyes
Defendant:
Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boone v. Matthews
as 4:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Boone
Defendant:
Kelly Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIA Network et al v. The City of Kerrville
as 5:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
LIA Network, Liberty In Action, Terri Hall and others
Defendant:
The City of Kerrville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copeland v. Nevarez et al
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Copeland
Defendant:
Jesus Nevarez, Jr, Judith Wells and Tarrant County (Family Courts)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant v. Immigration and Custom Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2024cv01390
Plaintiff:
Trevor Anthony Grant
Defendant:
Immigration and Custom Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and Randy Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Haynes v. Shonaz Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
Shonaz Foods, Inc. and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organization Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
