Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 16,890
Ramirez v. USA
as 4:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Gonzalo Briseno Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mallory v. USA
as 4:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Marcel Mallory
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rehman v. United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:19-cr-254.
as 4:2024cv00995
Petitioner:
Afzal Arsalan Rehman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Welch v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00192
Petitioner:
Brian Christopher Welch
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Thompson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00239
Petitioner:
Joseph Gabriel Thompson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Welch v. USA
as 4:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Brian Christopher Welch
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Lucious v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01095
Petitioner:
Denzell Devoe Lucious
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Washington v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00311
Petitioner:
Jacorey Washington
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hullaby v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Hullaby
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Mitchell Ray King, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
