Texas Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 849
Kennard v. Fish et al
as 3:2025cv00151
Plaintiff:
Romona Kennard
Defendant:
Joe Fish, Santa Marsheita Chiavari, NFN Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Longoria v. Nueces County, Texas
as 2:2025cv00012
Plaintiff:
Sara J. Longoria
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Guintini v. Cantex Continuing Care Network, LLC
as 5:2025cv00041
Defendant:
Cantex Continuing Care Network, LLC
Plaintiff:
Dilia Guintini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Peterson v. Meriplex Communications Ltd.
as 4:2025cv00081
Plaintiff:
Chris Peterson
Defendant:
Meriplex Communications Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Pendley v. City of Amarillo
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Tammy Pendley
Defendant:
City of Amarillo and Cole Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ramirez v. Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Independent School District
as 7:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Melissa Aguero Ramirez
Defendant:
Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Holcim SOR Inc
as 3:2024cv03059
Defendant:
Does 1-25 Inclusive and Holcim SOR Inc
Plaintiff:
Karnell Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howard v. Nielsen Audio, Inc.
as 4:2024cv04545
Plaintiff:
Ania Howard
Defendant:
Nielsen Audio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Russell v. Rich
as 4:2024cv01114
Defendant:
Amanda Rich
Plaintiff:
John Russell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Heitz v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
as 7:2024cv00448
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Plaintiff:
Yesenia Heitz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
